Dr. Dawson says that the Supreme Court has assigned liberties and rights to corporations before: non-profits, churches for example, are exempt from the very same requirements of the Affordable Care Act.
Hobby Lobby argued that under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act-its rights were being infringed upon.
That is exactly what so many find troubling-like student, Danny Sweeney, who has been following the case closely:
Dr. Dawson says the Hobby Lobby ruling was a very narrow one: as one for profit owned by two families with the same religious beliefs-so this wouldn't extend-to Corporate America:
But many feel that when it comes to women and reproductive health: there seems to be consistent controversy.